Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Gemini-Titan Vibrations Were Worse than Ares I

                  
    Bookmark and Share
  1. #1
    The Space Exploration Roundtable Moderator JimMcDade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    That Blue Planet- Latitude 33.56, Longitude 86.75
    Posts
    361
    Time Online
    2 Hours 21 Minutes 21 Seconds
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Gemini-Titan Vibrations Were Worse than Ares I

    This is a letter to the editor from my latest copy of Aviation Week & Space Technology:


    The Art of Simplicity
    Aviation Week & Space Technology
    09/01/2008 , page 8

    Greg De Santis
    The Villages, Fla.



    The problem of thrust oscillation on the Orion/Ares I is not too different from the oscillation problem on the Gemini/Titan system. In that case, the longitudinal vibration was so bad the astronauts could not see the instruments during the first 30 sec. of launch.

    The solution didn’t take months of meetings and vu-graphs, and it didn’t require adding 6,500 lb. of extra weight to the Titan. NASA simply sent astronaut Ed White to Ames to find a solution. We bolted a Gemini seat into the five-degree-of-freedom centrifuge, programmed the analog computers to simulate the vibration, and set about designing a damper to attach to the seat. The whole task from Ed’s arrival to finished design took less than three weeks. White flew our design on Gemini 4.


    We did have a number of advantages though: No contractors or “bean counters” were involved; we used 20-in. slide rules and K&E drafting equipment; a Mark’s Handbook; the best machine shop and machinists in the government; and a couple of young engineers who believed that working for NASA was the best job in the world.

    Look to the simplest solution.
    “The sky is NOT the limit!”- Jim McDade

    Reclaim the night sky. End light pollution NOW!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    185
    Time Online
    3 Hours 17 Minutes 9 Seconds
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Gemini-Titan Vibrations Were Worse than Ares I

    What does that 6,500lbs refer to?

    EDIT: Just found out on other thread
    Last edited by J.McDonald; 09-02-2008 at 07:02 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Age
    52
    Posts
    298
    Time Online
    11 Hours 42 Minutes 9 Seconds
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Downloads
    5
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Gemini-Titan Vibrations Were Worse than Ares I

    Quote Originally Posted by JimMcDade View Post
    This is a letter to the editor from my latest copy of Aviation Week & Space Technology:


    The Art of Simplicity
    Aviation Week & Space Technology
    09/01/2008 , page 8

    Greg De Santis
    The Villages, Fla.



    The problem of thrust oscillation on the Orion/Ares I is not too different from the oscillation problem on the Gemini/Titan system. In that case, the longitudinal vibration was so bad the astronauts could not see the instruments during the first 30 sec. of launch.

    The solution didn’t take months of meetings and vu-graphs, and it didn’t require adding 6,500 lb. of extra weight to the Titan. NASA simply sent astronaut Ed White to Ames to find a solution. We bolted a Gemini seat into the five-degree-of-freedom centrifuge, programmed the analog computers to simulate the vibration, and set about designing a damper to attach to the seat. The whole task from Ed’s arrival to finished design took less than three weeks. White flew our design on Gemini 4.


    We did have a number of advantages though: No contractors or “bean counters” were involved; we used 20-in. slide rules and K&E drafting equipment; a Mark’s Handbook; the best machine shop and machinists in the government; and a couple of young engineers who believed that working for NASA was the best job in the world.

    Look to the simplest solution.

    That isn't totally true. That didn't solve the problem. The Titan had to be modified and tested before NASA used it.

    http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...4203/ch7-2.htm
    http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...4203/ch8-2.htm

  4. #4
    The Space Exploration Roundtable Moderator JimMcDade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    That Blue Planet- Latitude 33.56, Longitude 86.75
    Posts
    361
    Time Online
    2 Hours 21 Minutes 21 Seconds
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Gemini-Titan Vibrations Were Worse than Ares I

    Quote Originally Posted by Me2 View Post
    That isn't totally true. That didn't solve the problem. The Titan had to be modified and tested before NASA used it.

    http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...4203/ch7-2.htm
    http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...4203/ch8-2.htm
    The relevant point is that the Gemini-Titan vibration problem was more severe than the Ares I vibration in terms of duration and timing in spite of the unsubstantiated claims made by the DIRECT 2.0 conspiracy theorists. The Ares I vibration might blur the vision of astronauts during the final few seconds prior to staging. The GT vibrations began at liftoff and continued for about half of one minute.

    We all know that the Titan was an ICBM that required a fair bit of modification to man-rate.
    “The sky is NOT the limit!”- Jim McDade

    Reclaim the night sky. End light pollution NOW!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    185
    Time Online
    3 Hours 17 Minutes 9 Seconds
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Gemini-Titan Vibrations Were Worse than Ares I

    If the Gemini-Titan oscillation prbolems were worse than Ares-I, yet solved by the use of seat dampeners, why are NASA looking to install 6,500lbs of active dampening in the LV?

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1
    Time Online
    1 Minute 31 Seconds
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Gemini-Titan Vibrations Were Worse than Ares I

    The installation of seat dampers would increase the re-entry weight of the Orion capsule.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    185
    Time Online
    3 Hours 17 Minutes 9 Seconds
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Gemini-Titan Vibrations Were Worse than Ares I

    That makes sense, especially as Orion has to go all the way to the moon and back. How heavy would seat dampers be? I just sort of presumed that if Gemini could soak up the extra mass, it couldn't be all that much.
    Is there an advantage in putting the dampening system 'down the chain' so that it protects the upper stage and paylaod, rather than just the crew themselves? Or are the oscillations not any concern to the hardware?

Similar Threads

  1. First Ares test sends only good vibrations
    By Inside KSC News Feeds in forum News Center
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-12-2009, 07:11 AM
  2. Springs to dampen NASA rocket's vibrations
    By Inside KSC News Feeds in forum DIRECT 3.0
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-11-2008, 09:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •